The dismantling of civic engagement programs, closing of offices supporting diversity, equity and inclusion, defunding of public scholarship centers, censoring of course syllabi containing language about race and detention of student activists are just a few of the consequences of President Donald Trump’s wave of attacks on higher education — from effectively shuttering the Department of Education to cancelling billions of dollars of federal funding for institutions. Such actions have a critical impact on the well-being and opportunities for students, faculty and staff across the country, including those within the Vanderbilt community.
“We want to make sure that Vanderbilt’s voice is present in…conversations with representatives across the aisle, and it’s very important that we make sure the core values that made American universities great are protected and supported,” Chancellor Daniel Diermeier said in an interview with The Hustler days after Trump’s issuance of an executive order targeting university DEI programs.
Yet, in the time since, the only external action from our administration has been sending a campus-wide email regarding the potential impacts of NIH funding cuts on the university’s research endeavors and the publication of an op-ed calling for universities to commit themselves to excellence, academic freedom, free expression and accessibility.
In his most recent debrief with The Hustler, Chancellor Diermeier stated that “Our job is to make sure we align and comply with [federal regulation] in our processes… on the issues that are core, we will be advocates if we think it’s appropriate and in the way we think is particularly impactful.”
But unlike the leaders at Wesleyan, Princeton and Harvard, Vanderbilt’s top staff members have chosen to remain publicly silent about Trump’s higher education agenda. Vanderbilt’s nonexistent criticism of Trump’s actions suggests that our institution’s leaders do not think standing up for higher education’s independence, academic freedom and the rights of students, faculty and staff is a core issue for the university. Rather than being morally courageous, we have chosen the easy route: to wait and see, to hide behind closed doors, to focus on compliance over resistance and to be reactive rather than proactive.
And the impacts of this approach have already arrived. From the cleansing of social justice language on university websites, access restrictions stemming from fears of ICE agents on campus and reductions in graduate program recruitment, the ripple effects of Trump’s federal orders are affecting every facet of our university.
In this tumultuous time, it is more important than ever that members of the higher education community make their thoughts known to university leaders. It is why the editorial board of Washington University’s student newspaper called on their chancellor to “raise your voice in support of everyone that is under attack by the Trump administration” and why hundreds of Harvard faculty members asked their governing board to “legally contest and refuse to comply with unlawful demands that threaten academic freedom and university self-governance.”
As a Vanderbilt student, I consider it my duty to advance these messages on our campus as well. Chancellor Diermeier, Provost C. Cybele Raver and all other members of our campus administration must make a public stand against Trump’s actions and work with other colleges across the country to fight his legislation, for the sake of our education and our democracy. Campus decision-makers: Now is the time for action, not cowardice.
Kristine Sherman Qualls • Apr 26, 2025 at 2:00 pm CDT
As an alumna, Class of ’70, I too am extremely disappointed that my beloved alma mater has not at least signed on to the “Call for Constructive Engagement” signed by more than 250 colleges and universities in resistance to Mr. Trump’s destructive stance and unlawful attacks on higher education. I read through the entire list hoping to find Vanderbilt University. I understand they will accept any and all signatures going forward. Get on it. Or even better, take a stand.
Jason Vadnos • Apr 29, 2025 at 12:28 am CDT
Kristine, thank you for your response, and I absolutely agree! I’m currently authoring a new article explaining why Vanderbilt should join the new Call for Constructive Engagement, and would love your input! Feel free to reach out to me, my email is on my staff bio on this website.
CJ Litsey • Apr 24, 2025 at 11:13 am CDT
I am very surprised Vanderbilt and it’s leadership have not voiced opposition to Washington administration and it’s outrageous policies. Very disappointed to read this.
Ann Shayne • Apr 24, 2025 at 7:59 am CDT
Daughter of an alum, spouse of an alum, donor over many decades, I am genuinely mystified as to why Vanderbilt’s chancellor has not joined his fellow members–300+ presidents–to stand with them in objection to the governmental overreach now threatening every institution of higher education. This is go time. This is not a time to watch and wait. Vanderbilt is a member of American Association of Colleges and Universities. What’s keeping you from signing that letter, Chancellor Diermeier?
Jason Vadnos • Apr 29, 2025 at 12:29 am CDT
Ann, thank you for your response, and I absolutely agree! I’m currently authoring a new article explaining why Vanderbilt should join the new Call for Constructive Engagement, and would love your input! Feel free to reach out to me, my email is on my staff bio on this website.
Georjan Overman • Apr 24, 2025 at 6:39 am CDT
As a Vanderbilt alumna, I was disheartened to find that the university has yet to stand with other colleges by signing the open letter. Cowering on the sidelines in hopes that remaining silent will appease this administration is an approach that has been tried before. It did not work in 1939. And Columbia has found that bowing to Trump’s demands has not restored its funding.
Vanderbilt should join the host of universities and colleges that are taking a public stand against coercion and for independence.
Jason Vadnos • Apr 29, 2025 at 12:29 am CDT
Georjan, thank you for your response, and I absolutely agree! I’m currently authoring a new article explaining why Vanderbilt should join the new Call for Constructive Engagement, and would love your input! Feel free to reach out to me, my email is on my staff bio on this website.
Vivian Valdmanis • Apr 23, 2025 at 8:29 am CDT
There is strength in numbers, I strongly urge Vanderbilt to join in with other universities in standing against attacks on academia.
I have been proud of my doctorate from Vanderbilt, I hope that my continued support will not be in vain
Charles Tucker - Vanderbilt ‘91 • Apr 22, 2025 at 4:44 pm CDT
I read through the list of 150+ universities that signed the letter in support of Harvard and was sad to see Vanderbilt was not among them. I hope the administration changes its mind and stands up for its community.
Jason Vadnos • Apr 29, 2025 at 12:29 am CDT
Charles, thank you for your response, and I absolutely agree! I’m currently authoring a new article explaining why Vanderbilt should join the new Call for Constructive Engagement, and would love your input! Feel free to reach out to me, my email is on my staff bio on this website.
Suzanne King • Apr 22, 2025 at 12:14 pm CDT
Great article, Jason. It’s past time for all Americans and American institutions to stand up to bullying by the Trump administration. Appeasement does not work.
Jason Vadnos • Apr 22, 2025 at 9:31 pm CDT
Thanks for your comment Suzanne, I wholeheartedly agree. In the words of Todd Wolfson, President of the American Association of University Professors, “Colleges and universities are the bedrock of American democracy and the engine of social mobility, innovation, and progress. We can’t allow fascists to strip it away. Now is the time to fight.”
Vandy Student • Apr 21, 2025 at 10:55 am CDT
Universities that have come out publicly against Trump have gotten hundreds of millions in funding cut. Vanderbilt is right to work tactically to advocate for itself without risking hundreds of its programs, faculty, and students that rely on the federal funds.
skelter • Apr 22, 2025 at 1:41 pm CDT
So in other words, “peace for our time.”
Jason Vadnos • Apr 22, 2025 at 9:41 pm CDT
Thank you for your thoughtful reply! While some universities which have stood up to Trump have had funding cut, this is not universally true (notably, Wesleyan made a strong public statement against Trump but has not been directly targeted). Moreover, many universities which did stand up (e.g., Harvard) only did so in response to Trump’s attacks.
Vanderbilt is not on the chopping block, and as a student at an institution with a multi-billion dollar endowment, I believe that we should be proactive in signaling to the Trump administration that their attacks on higher education are unjust, unlawful, and deeply harmful to our democracy. And of course, millions of dollars of federal funding are already being stripped from the university as the Trump administration freezes NIH, NSF, and other critical research grants, so now is the time for us to act.
That being said, I am NOT advocating for simply defying/resisting Trump’s actions. We SHOULD be working with legislators and other stakeholders to support our institution, but doing so does not have to come at the cost of imperiling higher education’s right to self-governance and academic freedom.
At the end of the day, only time will tell which strategy will be most beneficial to Vanderbilt. But this is not a question of what benefits the 20,000 members of our university community, but rather the more than 20 million college students across the country, and the very nature of our democracy. If we do not stand up to Trump’s bullying, we are only showing that higher education is ripe for a federal takeover. And in reviewing the history of authoritarianism, those who stood up rather than trying to appease – even in the face of major backlash – were almost always on the right side of history.
Joan Parmer • Apr 30, 2025 at 12:52 pm CDT
I graduated from Peabody when it was still a separate college from Vanderbilt. But I am well aware that what Vanderbilt decides has an impact on Peabody, which has been an institution that has brought students from around the world to help them become better educators. Caving to # 47 is showing that there is no respect for the reasons that Peabody exists, or Vanderbilt for that matter. Having students from different backgrounds makes any university stronger. SO, Vanderbilt, you manage to raise lots of money thanks to your sports teams. Don’t cave to a dictator (you know he wants to be one.) Show that you are a center for Learning!!! Oh, and caving is what Universities in Germany did in the 1930’s.
Joan graduate Peabody class 1976.